Monday, August 12, 2013

First experiment

Experiments, experiments, experiments. It's part of the reason for participating in AMRI. So what I've decided to capture data on first is power output of the DLP projector I'm using. In this particular case, I'm using the same projectors as the B9, a Vivitek D535.

For capturing the power output, I have access to a power meter and sensor by Coherent. A FieldMaxII meter and a PM150-50C sensor. Couple of points of interest in experimentation is overall power output of the projector, the drop off in power due to to distance from light source and power density per cm^2. 


The first point of interest will be useful when I start testing other projector setups, it'll help form the baseline marker for the various other projectors folks would like to use in a DLP 3D printer. The values gathered will also be good to gauge what power levels are adequate for overall reasonable layer/print times. At the moment, in talking with others working on DLP's in the community, the most important aspect folks look for is lumens (followed by native resolution), most are recommending builders work with at least 2,500 lumens. It'll be nice to see the effect of lumens on power output.

Tested Red projection
Tested Black projection
Tested White projection
One of the question I see being asked a lot is how scalable a DLP 3D printer can be. One would think that pulling back the projector and enlarging to projection area would be all that's needed. Sadly, that's not the case at all, and the reason it'll be interesting to see the power output over various throw distances and size prints. There are a lot of hypothesis and ideas, but it'd be nice to get quantitative values to back things up.

Lastly, power density is interesting to me because it'll allow for us to fine tune our exposure times. The thought is that if we can find the power output over an area, we can use that data to help extrapolate cure times for a specific layer height. On the point of cure times, polymerization rate will also be a future experiment.

Experiments like this is what AMRI is all about, applying the scientific method to create quantitative data for the betterment of research and development. The hope is that having empirical data to back up a lot of things that are taken at just face value will help people make advancements and not stumble over the same problems as others have before them. It's all about anchoring a foundation for which contributors can build upon prior research quickly and adapt results for new ideas.


  1. I'd like to see you compare with lower cost sensors too if possible. is a low cost luminosity/lux sensor. is it possible to calibrate/correlate polymerization rate to lux? it would make it easier to setup/calibrate new machines if so, and the linked sensor is only $8, so is approachable for most builders. not sure what the wavelength is polymerizing, but the one above seems to cover <300-1100nm. I don't think you can zero in on a wavelength with the raw sensor, but maybe with a filter that might be possible?

  2. I think there is def something to explore. I do realize that the sensor I'm using is out of most people's range, but that's the nice thing about AMRI :). We should set something up with that sensor when I get back, did some digging and it seems a few folks have built light intensity meters using similar chips.

  3. I am really pleased to read your blog, You know that There are many techniques for 3D printing, as well as melting material like plastic, sandstone, or metal through a heated nozzle, fusing powders along to make an object, and depositing layers of resins, waxes, or different materials to create up a 3D object. The different technical processes utilized by 3D printers and fast prototyping systems-Such as SLS, SLA, FDM, DMLS, SHS, DLP, PP, LOM and EBM. I see that you already discuss about it on the blog. Thanks a lot for published with us. Click here Best 3D printer manufacturer company in China.